Tokenomics & Viability Audit
A scored go/no-go — and we will tell you not to launch
An independent review of your token model before the TGE: reconstructed as a graph, stress-tested with Monte-Carlo simulation, and scored across the axes that decide whether an economy survives.
Most token models get reviewed too late — after the allocation is public and the contracts are written. We review before the TGE: we rebuild your economy as a graph, stress-test it with radCAD Monte-Carlo simulation, and score it across build complexity, revenue velocity, moat, GTM and regulatory exposure. If it doesn't hold, we say so — we've scored our own ventures and recommended against launching them.
Reviewed too late to change
By the time anyone checks, the allocation is public and the contracts are written. The cheapest fixes are already off the table.
Nobody is incentivised to say no
A consultant paid for a launch has no reason to recommend against one. The review that matters is the one that can fail you.
Structural weakness hides in a spreadsheet
Concentration, capture risk and reflexive loops don't show up in a table of percentages — they're relationships.
No score, just opinions
"Looks reasonable" isn't a decision input. Without a rubric you can't compare alternatives or justify the call to a board.
What we build
Model reconstruction
We rebuild your token economy as a queryable graph in Neo4j — allocations, vesting, emissions, incentive loops and governance paths — so structural weaknesses become visible.
Simulation stress-test
radCAD Monte-Carlo across hundreds of scenarios — unlock schedules, emissions and sell pressure — to surface where the model breaks under real dynamics.
Governance-capture check
Whether insiders still control the vote a year after unlock — a structural question a spreadsheet can't answer.
Scored verdict
A go/no-go across build, revenue, moat, GTM and regulatory exposure, with a written recommendation and, if it fails, re-scored alternatives.
What you walk away with
Deliverables, not a slide deck.
- A reconstructed graph model of your token economy
- radCAD Monte-Carlo stress-test results across unlock, emission and sell-pressure scenarios
- A governance-capture read: who clears quorum, and at what point in the schedule
- A scored rubric across build complexity, revenue velocity, moat, GTM and regulatory exposure
- A written go/no-go recommendation — with re-scored alternatives if it fails
How we engage
Intake
We ingest your model, allocations and contracts into a graph.
Model & simulate
Graph traversals for structure, radCAD Monte-Carlo for dynamics.
Scored verdict
A go/no-go with the evidence — and alternatives if it fails.
Where it matters most
The situations this is built for.
Pre-TGE go/no-go
You're weeks from launch and want an independent read before the allocation is irreversible.
Investor or exchange diligence
A third party is about to ask these questions. Better to have the answers, and the model behind them, first.
Inherited a model you didn't write
New team, existing tokenomics. We rebuild it as a graph so you can see what you actually own.
Proof
We've run this on our own ventures and told ourselves no: VinoWine scored 245/1000 and was killed; DevGuild scored 7.7/10 with "delay the token 6–12 months, narrow the MVP".
Questions
Model it. Prove it. Then launch.
Tell us what you're building. We'll come back with a tailored proposal.
Book a technical call